Friday evening is a great time for tinkering with a side project after a long week. You pour some tea, open your laptop and navigate to your project, only to find a red banner across whole app placed by the browser saying “Deceptive site ahead”.
const len = temperatures.length;，推荐阅读下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。获取更多信息
轮至我家时，虽由我爸掌勺，但设计菜单、采买食材、切配帮厨、收拾碗碟均由妈妈负责。通常年前大半个月，她就会拿出一张便签，细细写下预备的菜式和采买清单。，推荐阅读safew官方下载获取更多信息
13:48, 27 февраля 2026Из жизни。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
It’s Not AI Psychosis If It Works#Before I wrote my blog post about how I use LLMs, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek blog post titled Can LLMs write better code if you keep asking them to “write better code”? which is exactly as the name suggests. It was an experiment to determine how LLMs interpret the ambiguous command “write better code”: in this case, it was to prioritize making the code more convoluted with more helpful features, but if instead given commands to optimize the code, it did make the code faster successfully albeit at the cost of significant readability. In software engineering, one of the greatest sins is premature optimization, where you sacrifice code readability and thus maintainability to chase performance gains that slow down development time and may not be worth it. Buuuuuuut with agentic coding, we implicitly accept that our interpretation of the code is fuzzy: could agents iteratively applying optimizations for the sole purpose of minimizing benchmark runtime — and therefore faster code in typical use cases if said benchmarks are representative — now actually be a good idea? People complain about how AI-generated code is slow, but if AI can now reliably generate fast code, that changes the debate.